Evolving History
Chicago’s Goodman Theatre in October restaged the 1955 play Inherit the Wind, taking theatergoers back to 1925 when the state of Tennessee prosecuted teacher John Scopes for violating the recently passed Butler Law prohibiting anyone from teaching “any theory that denies the Story of the Divine Creation of Man as taught in the Bible and to teach instead that man had descended from a lower order of animals.”
After Charles Darwin’s Origin of Species was published in 1859, schools in the US soon began teaching the theory of evolution. (Edward J. Larson: Trial and Error)
In the 1920s, however, state legislatures tried to prohibit the practice:
In 1921 and -22 Kentucky and South Carolina’s efforts were defeated.
In 1923, schools in Oklahoma were prevented from purchasing textbooks that published information about and teachers from teaching evolution.
In 1924, the governor of North Carolina dropped two textbooks from public schools’ curricula so students wouldn’t see “a picture of a monkey and a man on the same page.” (Trial and Error, p 61)
In 1925 the Tennessee legislature passed its prohibition nearly unanimously—71 to 5 in the state house and 24-6 in the state senate—and other states followed the same path: Texas, Mississippi, and Arkansas. (Trial and Error)
The US Supreme Court in 1968 ruled unanimously that an Arkansas law outlawing the teaching of evolution violated the First Amendment of the Constitution separating church and state. https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/epperson-v-arkansas/
Nevertheless, more than 50 years later, teaching about the theory of evolution is still being challenged. A US District Court in August of this year dismissed an Indiana lawsuit alleging that the teaching of evolution violated the state constitution (National Center for Science Education). And while the theory is taught in all 50 states and the District of Columbia, it must be accompanied by the teaching of creationism in 17 states. (https://nesc.ngo)
Attitudes about evolution are, dare I say, evolving. A three-decade longitudinal study shows GenXers’ acceptance of the theory increases with age. Between 38 and 44 percent of the 5000 GenXers in the study accepted the theory when they were in high school compared to between 54 and 57 percent today. And their uncertainty declines over time: 37 percent were unsure about the theory in high school; only 11 to 13 percent are today. (https://eeb.msu.edu/news/awesome-or-bogus-gen-x-attitudes-toward-evolution.aspx
The theory of evolution itself is evolving. Scientists are documenting how humans continue to evolve as a result of changes in medicine, agriculture, and culture. (Conor Feehly: How Are Human Still Evolving, Discover magazine)
Where Language Came From
One area of particular interest is the evolution of language. Steven Mithen, a prehistory professor at the University of Reading, explores The Language Puzzle by tracing developments across time in anthropology, archaeology, genetics, linguistics, and psychology. He compares and contrasts language among the closest living relatives to man—chimpanzees—noting that chimps make sounds that are similar to words but they do not form actual speech because of anatomical and cognitive limitations. (Steven Mithen: The Language Puzzle, Basic Books, 2024)
One of the first scientists to try to unravel the language puzzle was the naturalist Richard L. Garner.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Lynch_Garner
As a child growing up in Appalachia, Lynch first came up with the idea that animals talk. “I believed that all animals of the same kind could understand each other, and I recall many instances in which they really did so.” Yet his elders denied that animals could actually speak. That led him to investigate the sounds animals make, how these sounds compare or differ from speech, and the overall question: what is speech? (Richard Lynch Garner: Apes and Monkeys. Their Life and Language, 1900).
https://www.amazon.com/Apes-monkeys-Their-life-language/dp/B00085QGBY
Garner’s book, Apes and Monkeys, published in 1900, challenged the belief at the time that animals did not interact with their environment or communicate with one another by presenting his observations of monkeys and apes in a caged environment as well as the wild, his interactions with monkeys he considered to be friends, and his time in the French Congo where he lived in a six foot-square cage for weeks at a time. He noted how monkeys keep watch and warn one another of possible danger, discriminate between items of food and invariably choose the largest one offered, adjust to games with a set number of marbles and search for missing ones when the total differs from what they’re used to. (https://www.erbzine.com/mag18/garner.htm )
While in the cage he built near Lake Ferman Vax in Gaboon, he watched as a school of monkeys surrounded and inspected the structure, heard the changes in bird calls over the course of the day, worried when a leopard approached after tracking his scent, and woke every morning to the cry of the king gorilla.
In the preface to the book, author Garner “frankly confesses to his own belief in the psychic unity of all animate nature. Believing in a common source of life, a common law of living, and a common destiny for all creatures, he feels that to dignify the apes is not to degrade man but rather to exalt him.
“Believing that a more perfect knowledge of these animals will bring man into closer fellowship and deeper sympathy with nature, and with an abiding trust that it will widen the bounds of humanity and cause man to realize that he and they are but common links in the one great chain of life, the author gives this work to the world. When once man is impressed with the consciousness that in some degree, however small, all creatures think and feel, it will lessen his vanity and ennoble his heart.”
The fictional memoir Man in a Cage, published in 2020, recaps Garner’s early experiments recording the sounds primates make min the Cincinnati Zoo and his first trip to Africa.
Man in a Cage - Kindle edition by Nevins, Patrick. Literature & Fiction Kindle eBooks @ Amazon.com.
As written by this author in a review for the Historical Novel Society (see: https://historicalnovelsociety.org/reviews/man-in-a-cage/), “Man in a Cage chronicles Garner’s travels and difficulties gaining support for his work—the promised Edison phonograph that never arrives in Gabon, the sudden loss of funding—as well as the threats and dangers of the jungle from sudden fever and a mysterious attack on the cage: was it done by animals or men?
“Written in a fresh, almost ingenuous manner, the first-person narrative lets readers share Garner’s enthusiasm and breathlessness as he navigates elephant trails and fingers of jungle, discovers subtle animal behaviors… [takes note of] underlying conflicts among tribesmen, traders, and missionaries…and [encounters] uncertainty about the theory of evolution, and outright disparagement among religious groups that classify any thought of the links between man and primates as heresy.”
Evolution on Trial
The Scopes Monkey Trial, called the Trial of the Century in 1925, is actually only one of five Trials of the Century in the 1920s. The first was the prosecution of the Italian anarchists Sacco and Vanzetti (1920-7), next was the rape conviction involving silent film star Fatty Arbuckle (1921), then the Hall-Mills trial involving an Episcopal priest and a choir member (1922), and the “perfect crime” trial of Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb (1924).
The Scopes trial pitted high-profile personages against one another. For the prosecution: William Jennings Bryan, three-time presidential candidate known for his oratory in support of Evangelicals, farmers, and the downtrodden. For the defense: Clarence Darrow, fresh from his 12-hour summation in the Leopold and Loeb case that exhorted the court to refrain from sentencing the boys to death, nothing that “all life is worth saving, and that mercy is the highest attribute of man.” (Gregg Jarrett: Trial of the Century, p 43)
The defendant John T. Scopes agreed to become involved when local Dayton, Tennessee, businessmen sponsored and the American Civil Liberties Union funded a lawsuit that tested the constitutionality of the Butler Law and incongruously required teachers to use a specific biology textbook but then make it criminal for a teacher to teach from the pages devoted to evolution. (Trial of the Century, p 146)
The trial lasted less than two weeks and had its share of controversies and carnival consequences. The judge would not allow any testimony from experts about the theory of evolution and its grounding in science. The town of Dayton became a sideshow with self-appointed preachers railing against evolution, shops and stalls hawking toy monkey souvenirs, and reporters from more than 100 newspapers wedging themselves among the 1000 people in the gallery. (ACLU: State of Tennessee v. Scopes, July 21, 1925)
Though the jury took only minutes to find Scopes guilty and the judge fined him $100 for teaching that man descended from a lower order of animals, the verdict was reversed on appeal. The Tennessee Supreme Court found that the judge erred in deciding on the amount of the fine; only juries could impose fines of more than $50. But it upheld the constitutionality of the law that stopped teachers from teaching the theory of evolution. (James C. Foster: Scopes Monkey Trial, Free Speech Center, July 2, 2024)
Known for the brisk back-and-forth between Darrow and Bryan, trial testimony was, not surprisingly, dramatized in the 1955 play as well as the 1960 film starring Spencer Tracy and Fredric March. The two men jousted over the meaning of Biblical references to Cain’s wife, the length of a day of creation, the time men have lived on earth, the time the earth was created, and the date of Noah’s flood. Darrow asks Bryan:
“What do you think that the Bible itself says? Don’t you know how it was arrived at?”
“I never made a calculation.”
“A calculation from what?”
“I could not say.”
“What do you think?”
“I do not think about things I don’t think about.”
“Do you think about things you do think about?”
As the Henry Drummond character said in the play and film: “He that troubleth his own house shall inherit the wind.”
Sources:
Richard Lynch Garner. 1900 Apes and Monkeys. Their Life and Language. Boston/London: Ginn & Company
https://www.erbzine.com/mag18/garner.htm
https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/epperson-v-arkansas/
https://nesc.ngo
Edward J. Larson: Trial and Error
Conor Feehly: How Are Human Still Evolving, Discover magazine)
Gregg Jarrett: Trial of the Century, p 43
ACLU: State of Tennessee v. Scopes, July 21, 1925
James C. Foster: Scopes Monkey Trial, Free Speech Center, July 2, 2024)